The Guardian

Campaigners condemn plans for New Forest desalination plant

The Guardian logo The Guardian 5/05/2021 14:17:24 Patrick Barkham
a body of water surrounded by trees: Photograph: Derek Payne/Alamy © Provided by The GuardianPhotograph: Derek Payne/Alamy

Plans to build an energy-hungry desalination plant inside the New Forest national park to provide drinking water for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight have been condemned by campaigners including the broadcaster Chris Packham.

Southern Water's proposal for a £600m plant at Fawley to convert saltwater from the Solent into tap water during droughts has been formally opposed by the New Forest national park authority. A separate petition against the plan, which the water company said it would enable it to extract less water from ecologically sensitive chalk streams such as the Test and the Itchen, has attracted several thousand signatures.

Residents objecting to the plant say that it is a "bizarre" and "expensive" solution for projected water shortages in southern England, with Britain's total water supply forecast to drop by 7% by 2045. The National Audit Office recently warned that water companies will need to reduce the amount they extract by 500m litres every day to protect waterways and wider biodiversity.

Although Thames Water opened Britain's first significant desalination plant in east London in 2010, the technology requires a lot of energy to work and is more commonly used in desert settlements in parts of Australia and Dubai.

Packham, who lives in the New Forest, said that while it was necessary to reduce abstraction from internationally significant chalk streams such as the Test, a desalination plant for drought emergencies was a baffling investment.

Chris Packham wearing a uniform: Chris Packham: 'Why would a water company be investing hundreds of millions to build something which they are saying they only need every 20 years?' Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA © Provided by The GuardianChris Packham: 'Why would a water company be investing hundreds of millions to build something which they are saying they only need every 20 years?' Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA

"Why would a water company be investing hundreds of millions to build something which they are saying they only need every 20 years?" he said. "It's too much money on something that's entirely inappropriate. We really, really don't need it. What we need is to cut down on water leakage and for everyone to use water more responsibly. Water is also too cheap - we need to pay what water really costs."

Opponents of the plan include Julie Hope, who is standing as a Labour candidate in the local elections.


Gallery: Pollution around the world: 50 shocking photos (Espresso)

"This isn't about politics, this is about protecting the environment for people in this area," said Hope. "It's becoming very industrialised all along the Solent now. It's not what people want and I don't think it's needed. We should not need water taken from the sea when we've got so much of it falling from the sky."

New Forest district council and the New Forest national park authority have both objected to the plant, with the national park authority criticising Southern Water's failure to consult it sooner about its plans, which it has been developing since 2019.

Stuart Singleton-White, the head of campaigns at the Angling Trust, said both the government and the water companies were "failing miserably" in their legal duty to protect internationally significant chalk streams such as the Test and Itchen.

Desalination "may have a part to play, but it is an expensive option, both in terms of cost to build and in terms of the energy needed to run the plant", he said. "We need a new relationship with water. In England, we have among the highest consumption of water per head in Europe, at about 140 litres a day per person. The government and water companies have a goal of reducing this to about 110 litres a day over time. This is not ambitious enough.

"Investing the cost it would take to build and operate a desalination plant in reducing consumption, stopping leaks and storing more water would bring greater benefits."

Southern Water said it was seeking the views of customers and stakeholders on its plans at what was a pivotal moment for "reshaping how we source, treat and supply water in Hampshire". The company said it was also exploring the feasibility of recycling water and transferring it from a new reservoir at Havant Thicket, near Portsmouth, a scheme that it said had recently emerged as a potential backup to desalination.

a pond surrounded by trees: Southern Water said the proposed desalination plant would enable it to extract less water from ecologically sensitive chalk streams such as the River Itchen. © Photograph: Derek Payne/AlamySouthern Water said the proposed desalination plant would enable it to extract less water from ecologically sensitive chalk streams such as the River Itchen.

Related: Lake District river to have bends restored in flood prevention plan

Toby Willison, Southern Water's director of environment and corporate affairs, said: "We have a responsibility to help keep rivers and taps flowing in the face of a changing climate and a growing population.

"This means taking less water from the Test and Itchen rivers - two of the finest chalk streams in the world - and making up the shortfall with new sources.

"Our plan includes reducing leakage, improving water efficiency and taking more water from neighbouring companies, but these alone are not enough to satisfy either the large shortfall or the time frame.

"Larger solutions such as desalination are required to ensure there's enough water for people and the natural world, especially during a drought when it's needed most."

mercredi 5 mai 2021 17:17:24 Categories: The Guardian

ShareButton
ShareButton
ShareButton
  • RSS

Suomi sisu kantaa
NorpaNet Beta 1.1.0.18818 - Firebird 5.0 LI-V6.3.2.1497

TetraSys Oy.

TetraSys Oy.